Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Response to In Wyoming
Spragg’s
In Wyoming utilizes multiple long, fragmented sentences throughout the story
that give it an almost tired feeling, because of the way that the story has to
be read. Spragg uses copious amounts of commas, especially presenting lists
within the first few paragraphs, such as, “Wyoming boasts coal, oil, gas,
uranium, widely scattered herds of sheep and cattle, and once, several million
bison” (52). Lists such as these present the facts of Wyoming in a way that
becomes monotonous and almost boring, the way that Wyoming itself is probably
supposed to appear to the reader.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yeah, I think you're right, except "boring" is not a particularly descriptive word. Stark, austere. Something like that maybe.
ReplyDeleteGood recognition, though.